<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">

	<title>iamcal.com Linklog</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iamcal.com/linklog/"/>
	<link rel="icon" type="image/jpeg" href="http://www.iamcal.com/images/logo.gif"/>
	<info type="text/html" mode="escaped">All the links from iamcal.com</info>
	<modified>2009-02-28T19:17:28Z</modified>
	<generator url="http://www.iamcal.com/">Flickr</generator>

	<entry>
		<title>2009-02-28 19:17:28</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iamcal.com/linklog/1235877448/"/>
		<id>tag:iamcal.com,2005:/linklog/1235877448/</id>
		<issued>2009-02-28T19:17:28Z</issued>
		<modified>2009-02-28T19:17:28Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped">i've been going back and forth with dominic sayers for the last couple of weeks on RFC-based email validation. we both have php functions (&lt;a href=&quot;http://code.iamcal.com/php/rfc822/&quot;&gt;mine&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dominicsayers.com/isemail/&quot;&gt;his&lt;/a&gt;) that pass a huge (and esoteric) test suite. who says RFCs are dull? (hint: they are)</content>
		<author>
			<name>Cal Henderson</name>
			<url>http://www.iamcal.com/</url>
		</author>
	</entry>

</feed>
