<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
>
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.iamcal.com/">
		<title>iamcal.com</title>
		<link>http://www.iamcal.com/</link>
		<description>All the links rom iamcal.com</description>
		<dc:date>2009-03-01T03:13:00Z</dc:date>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.flickr.com/" />

		<image rdf:about="http://www.iamcal.com/images/logo.gif">
			<url>http://www.iamcal.com/images/logo.gif</url>
			<title>iamcal.com</title>
			<link>http://www.iamcal.com/</link>
		</image>

		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iamcal.com/2009-03/2080/" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>

	</channel>

	<item rdf:about="http://www.iamcal.com/2009-03/2080/">
		<title>1st March, 3:13 am</title>
		<link>http://www.iamcal.com/2009-03/2080/</link>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.warehouseapp.com/&quot;&gt;warehouse&lt;/a&gt; looks pretty good, but it requires both ruby on rails (easy-ish to install) and the ruby-svn bindings (which are basically a bitch). why do the harder languages to get up and running on the web (ruby and python) require the bindings while the easier languages (php and perl) just shell out and so work easily? gah. currently using &lt;a href=&quot;http://websvn.tigris.org/&quot;&gt;websvn&lt;/a&gt; in php which does a reasonable job and is trivial to set up.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<dc:date>2009-03-01T03:13:00Z</dc:date>
		<dc:creator>Cal Henderson (http://www.iamcal.com/)</dc:creator>
	</item>

</rdf:RDF>