<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">

	<title>iamcal.com</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iamcal.com/"/>
	<link rel="icon" type="image/jpeg" href="http://www.iamcal.com/images/logo.gif"/>
	<info type="text/html" mode="escaped">All the links rom iamcal.com</info>
	<modified>2009-03-01T03:17:00Z</modified>
	<generator url="http://www.iamcal.com/">Flickr</generator>

	<entry>
		<title>1st March, 3:17 am</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iamcal.com/2009-03/2083/"/>
		<id>tag:iamcal.com,2005:/blog/2083/</id>
		<issued>2009-03-01T03:17:00Z</issued>
		<modified>2009-03-01T03:17:00Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;p&gt;i&#039;ve been going back and forth with dominic sayers for the last couple of weeks on RFC-based email validation. we both have php functions (&lt;a href=&quot;http://code.iamcal.com/php/rfc822/&quot;&gt;mine&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dominicsayers.com/isemail/&quot;&gt;his&lt;/a&gt;) that pass a huge (and esoteric) test suite. who says RFCs are dull? (hint: they are)&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
		<author>
			<name>Cal Henderson</name>
			<url>http://www.iamcal.com/</url>
		</author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>4th March, 1:55 am</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iamcal.com/2005-03/794/"/>
		<id>tag:iamcal.com,2005:/blog/794/</id>
		<issued>2005-03-04T01:55:00Z</issued>
		<modified>2005-03-04T01:55:00Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;p&gt;the html validator &lt;a href=&quot;http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/&quot;&gt;plugin&lt;/a&gt; for firefox is neato. saves uploading your work and tkaing trip to the validator pages.&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
		<author>
			<name>Cal Henderson</name>
			<url>http://www.iamcal.com/</url>
		</author>
	</entry>

</feed>
