<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
>
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.iamcal.com/">
		<title>iamcal.com</title>
		<link>http://www.iamcal.com/</link>
		<description>All the links rom iamcal.com</description>
		<dc:date>2009-03-04T00:25:00Z</dc:date>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.flickr.com/" />

		<image rdf:about="http://www.iamcal.com/images/logo.gif">
			<url>http://www.iamcal.com/images/logo.gif</url>
			<title>iamcal.com</title>
			<link>http://www.iamcal.com/</link>
		</image>

		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iamcal.com/2009-03/2088/" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>

	</channel>

	<item rdf:about="http://www.iamcal.com/2009-03/2088/">
		<title>4th March, 12:25 am</title>
		<link>http://www.iamcal.com/2009-03/2088/</link>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quirksmode.org/oddsandends/wbr.html&quot;&gt;quirksmode page on wrappable zero-width spacing&lt;/a&gt; for the web is interesting. seems like we still need to browser detect, but we can use &amp;amp;shy; everywhere but FF2, so it&#039;s not a tough detection (=~ /Firefox\/2&amp;#46;/). I wonder though, does putting the hyphen within (as in ppk&#039;s example) a function name cause ambiguity? maybe zero-width space (with wbr tags for old IEs) is a better generic solution. what are other people using?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<dc:date>2009-03-04T00:25:00Z</dc:date>
		<dc:creator>Cal Henderson (http://www.iamcal.com/)</dc:creator>
	</item>

</rdf:RDF>