Posted by
cal, 17:14, 12th August 2002:
Can you
spot the
artgeek?
My lego models are never
this good
You can now
steal my words through RSS. enjoy
Thanks to sul, you too can now
express your non-cal-ness
<dphead> I think my cat is sick :(
<phunqe> Why?
<dphead> It's all twitchy and stuff...
<phunqe> I'm sure it's just lagged.
<phunqe> Check its fps.
This still has me laughing.
Posted by
cal, 17:16, 12th August 2002:
grr - the bash.org database appears to be down :(
Posted by
Grim..., 17:37, 12th August 2002:
Ah - that's why it doesn't work.
I am not laughing.
Posted by
Grim..., 18:09, 12th August 2002:
As for the ArtGeek - is it the teacher?
Is the second link meant to somehow give us the answer?
(Confused).
Posted by
Sul, 19:20, 12th August 2002:
I dont feel as though I'm an iamcal fan... more of an iamcal user thankyou very much! ;)
Posted by
jeff, 23:43, 12th August 2002:
ok heres a clue. that was 16 years ago, i'm now 21...
and uh, like, the second link is my website.. which has pictures of me on... n stuff.. so yeah, its a clue...
oh and damn you cal!
i'm just a plain 'cal' user... huh huh
damn, i shouldnt have had that drink...
Posted by
mattjacob, 06:57, 13th August 2002:
That Lego creation is supa-sweet.
Posted by
cal, 08:09, 13th August 2002:
sul/jeff: fan? user? what are you talking about?
Posted by
jeff, 10:04, 13th August 2002:
i dont know. i was just following sul's lead. i never know what i'm talking about.
Posted by
cal, 12:08, 13th August 2002:
so sul - what do you mean by "I dont feel as though I'm an iamcal fan... more of an iamcal user "
Posted by
Sul, 14:05, 13th August 2002:
Weblog & Discussion, with replies
The feed to end all feeds, this contains all messages posted to iamcal, and thus can be quite busy. In any day there can be upwards of a few hundred posts. Beware, hardcore iamcal fans only.
User is possibly the wrong word I wanted also. Member perhaps? I dont know. I feel I'm a little bit more than just a 'fan' :p
Posted by
cal, 14:37, 13th August 2002:
ahh,
this
you're right. i've updated to somehting far more suitable.
Posted by
cal, 17:50, 13th August 2002:
er, yes. you can read. well done?
Posted by
reitsma, 02:23, 14th August 2002:
oy - cal, i looked at the images directory for that lego picture, and he has a whole heap of 'femme' lego pics.
soli.inav.net/~thomas/mfactory/graphics/...
scary stuff.
Posted by
Sul, 15:09, 14th August 2002:
I'm not an addict, I can quit any time I want!
Posted by
jeff, 15:41, 14th August 2002:
yeah, me too. just put me on a remote, phone free island, and i can quit... yeah...
Posted by
cal, 17:02, 14th August 2002:
i don't want anyone to quit :(
Posted by
Sul, 23:22, 14th August 2002:
Thats exactly what the tobacco manafacturers say!
Perhaps you should word it like so:
Beware, hardcore iamcal addicts only (although they're really nice and shouldn't really be termed as addicts because they could quit when they want but dont need to because they're not hurting anyone by doing what they're doing OK?! Good, lets leave it there then shall we?).
Posted by
cal, 08:14, 15th August 2002:
there will soon be "no iamcal" zones in public places :)
