Posted by
cal, 09:40, 19th August 2002:
Someone explain how the last line of
this page happened?
Posted by
Sul, 10:57, 19th August 2002:
I like that, the BBC being bitchy.
"the most boring weblog in the world?"
is that a rhetorical question? or would they honestly like us to email them the answer?
Posted by
cal, 10:59, 19th August 2002:
please don't submit iamcal ;)
Posted by
jeff, 11:40, 19th August 2002:
well we all know the answer anyway... i think it must have been rhetorical.
Posted by
cal, 11:41, 19th August 2002:
ooooh, saucer of milk for thread 1295 please!
Posted by
cal, 11:56, 19th August 2002:
as in, stop be catty, jess
Posted by
Darren, 13:54, 19th August 2002:
The title to Nick Jordan's website is:
"Probably the most boring weblog in the world"
Which explains it.
Posted by
nick, 14:04, 19th August 2002:
Being as tedious as I am doesn't just happen, you know. It takes years of hard work.
Posted by
cal, 15:31, 19th August 2002:
i realise that (and all credit to you) but how did it end up on the bbc site. darren?
and the end line is ace:
"The BBC's not responsible for the content of external sites. Especially that last one."
Posted by
saima, 18:37, 19th August 2002:
The whole article is rather suspect.
Not as suspect as darren's profile
Posted by
jeff, 20:51, 19th August 2002:
moi? catty? pfff. ah well, i like a man that can admit his faults... ok, not
like.. mildy admire from a distance.. very mildly.
Posted by
cal, 20:57, 19th August 2002:
who are you talking about now?
Posted by
Darren, 23:39, 19th August 2002:
What's suspect about my profile? It's just a quote from an evil genius.
Posted by
Sul, 00:57, 20th August 2002:
Dr Evil? From the second draft of the script for Austin Powers 2, no?
Posted by
ell, 12:53, 22nd August 2002:
Sounds almost "League of Gentlemen" to me.