Discussion » Anger Management

This is a read-only copy. The forum ran on iamcal.com from 2000 until its database was lost in 2016, and this topic was rebuilt from copies saved by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. Some replies may be missing.
Posted by jlittle, 09:42, 10th July 2003:
 
Don't go and watch this film, it's a pile of poo.
Posted by beargod, 09:45, 10th July 2003:
 
It looked good and has 2 good actors in it though, I am drawn to it, but not very powerfully or I would have seen it already :)
Posted by jlittle, 09:55, 10th July 2003:
 
two good actors yes - shite plot/story line, also yes.
Posted by arsepuppy, 09:57, 10th July 2003:
 
*tries hard not to start slagging off so-called "classic" films*
Posted by arsepuppy, 09:58, 10th July 2003:
 
NNGGGGGGGGGG.....ARRRGGGHHH

"Back To The Future 2" was the only good one in the trilogy, the rest were arse.....


NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by chandler, 10:00, 10th July 2003:
 
hey its 2003. they only have 12 years left to invent the hoverboard. i think serious arse will be kicked if they dont manage it
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:00, 10th July 2003:
 
"Donnie Darko" was a sub-Lynch self indulgent "just-out-of-film-school" cliched mess only saved by a killer soundtrack...


STOP IT!!!! NO!!!
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:01, 10th July 2003:
 
You mean they didn't use real hoverboards in the film???? :(
Posted by chandler, 10:02, 10th July 2003:
 
(not sure who "they" are)
Posted by beargod, 10:02, 10th July 2003:
 
good point and those self drying, zipping clothes and the clothes go to the right size automatically same with the shoes and the hologram billboards
Posted by chandler, 10:02, 10th July 2003:
 
no, sorry ap, it was all done with mirrors and doublesided stickytape
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:03, 10th July 2003:
 
Twats. They lied to me. LIED.
Posted by chandler, 10:05, 10th July 2003:
 
all the more reason to kick their asses if they dont invent them soon
Posted by Victor Menendez, 10:09, 10th July 2003:
 
ooh, i just mentioned hoverboards in an unrelated thread. spooky.
Posted by MUSTANGMACH1, 10:11, 10th July 2003:
 
chay why did you leave cars.
Posted by chandler, 10:13, 10th July 2003:
 
i didnt "leave" anywhere. this isnt a chatroom, its a messageboard.

why is it that the last 6 or so kids that have stumbled accross this site dont understand the difference?
Posted by beargod, 10:16, 10th July 2003:
 
I don't know, do they sleep with Michael Jackson?
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:17, 10th July 2003:
 
I think Cal should follow the example of other messageboards and charge for logins.
Posted by chandler, 10:18, 10th July 2003:
 
"chay why did you leave cars."

can i just say
*thud*
Posted by MUSTANGMACH1, 10:18, 10th July 2003:
 
i'AM not a kid i'M 27 years old.
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:18, 10th July 2003:
 
And I should charge for use of "*thud*"

;)
Posted by chandler, 10:18, 10th July 2003:
 
on my site you can sign up but not do very much until either me or beargod give permission to comment or post items or add to the gallery.

that works well. then no idiots can sign up
Posted by beargod, 10:19, 10th July 2003:
 
trouble with charging, people might not want to join, but they could have been good friends
Posted by beargod, 10:20, 10th July 2003:
 
I think life should be fun untill you die
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:21, 10th July 2003:
 
No it shouldn't. It should be all toil and distress, and then your arse falls out.
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:21, 10th July 2003:
 
Chay! Peeps is fucked!
Posted by chandler, 10:22, 10th July 2003:
 
"Chay! Peeps is fucked!"
???
in what way!
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:25, 10th July 2003:
 
Fixed now. Database errors etc.
Posted by beargod, 10:25, 10th July 2003:
 
ap bum dog is fucked ;)
Posted by Victor Menendez, 10:25, 10th July 2003:
 
IaM alSo TwenTIE SeVEn ! aM GlaDD i WEnnt To sKoooL thO.
Posted by Sul, 10:25, 10th July 2003:
 
There could be some sort of induction. Like you can only post in certain threads until its decided that your not a fucking cock.
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:26, 10th July 2003:
 
You make no sense Simon.
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:26, 10th July 2003:
 
LOL@Vic.
Posted by beargod, 10:27, 10th July 2003:
 
thats what we do Sul

AP: you saying that you don't have sex?
Posted by Victor Menendez, 10:27, 10th July 2003:
 
tum-te-tum
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:28, 10th July 2003:
 
"sexygirl153"
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:28, 10th July 2003:
 
;)
Posted by beargod, 10:28, 10th July 2003:
 
DUDE!
Posted by cal, 10:29, 10th July 2003:
 
sul: perhaps that's a good idea. like have a sepcial forum for new users. only once i like them do they get full membership.
Posted by Victor Menendez, 10:31, 10th July 2003:
 
maybe we can fit them with stabilisers.
Posted by Victor Menendez, 10:31, 10th July 2003:
 
La-La-La
Posted by beargod, 10:32, 10th July 2003:
 
Cal, make it so the admin can look at what they are writing first then if its good let them have free range, but then again that would need an admin on at all times
Posted by Victor Menendez, 10:32, 10th July 2003:
 
dum-de-dum
Posted by beargod, 10:33, 10th July 2003:
 
DUDE!
Posted by MUSTANGMACH1, 10:33, 10th July 2003:
 
HOTMAMA2837
Posted by arsepuppy, 10:33, 10th July 2003:
 
They should do an initiation thing where there's three eggs and they have to pick the right one.
Posted by beargod, 10:34, 10th July 2003:
 
not the black one
Posted by chandler, 10:35, 10th July 2003:
 
all it needs is a box to tick when you sign up that says "are you an american teenager that can't type properly?"

if they tick the box then they dont get to sign up.

i for one would trust everyone to answer that question honestly.
Posted by Sul, 10:36, 10th July 2003:
 
Or some sort of aptitude test:

Q1. Which one of the following would you be most likley to post?
a: Hi, my names, Nigel. How are you guys going?
b: 'Sup foo's I 0wNs j00 4LL
Posted by chandler, 10:38, 10th July 2003:
 
trouble is that many type:

a: Hi, my names, Nigel. How are you guys going?

and their next post is:

"WHY WONT YOU GUYS FUCKING ANSWER ME YOU WANKERS"

:D
Posted by Sul, 10:39, 10th July 2003:
 
lol, true :)
Posted by cheekysexygirlprincess1337, 10:44, 10th July 2003:
 
HALLa
Posted by cheekysexygirlprincess1337, 10:44, 10th July 2003:
 
WHY WONT YOU GUYS FUCKING ANSWER ME YOU WANKERS
Posted by cheekysexygirlprincess1337, 10:44, 10th July 2003:
 
whats a wanker?
Posted by MUSTANGMACH1, 10:48, 10th July 2003:
 
You don't know what a wanker is.
Posted by chandler, 10:48, 10th July 2003:
 
aaaaaagggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
*thud*

vic, sul, ap, bg, et al, please reassure me that none of you are MUSTANGMACH1
Posted by Victor Menendez, 10:49, 10th July 2003:
 
I am not MUSTANGMACH1.
Posted by beargod, 11:02, 10th July 2003:
 
I am beargod
Posted by cal, 11:05, 10th July 2003:
 
mustangmach is using aol. enough said
Posted by jlittle, 11:23, 10th July 2003:
 
lol
Posted by Victor Menendez, 11:41, 10th July 2003:
 
no, AOL.
Posted by chandler, 11:43, 10th July 2003:
 
groan
Posted by beargod, 11:44, 10th July 2003:
 
shit that took me a groan to figure out it was a joke :(
Posted by Victor Menendez, 11:45, 10th July 2003:
 
:D
Posted by jlittle, 11:59, 10th July 2003:
 
how is it that every single post always goes off topic !
Posted by beargod, 12:01, 10th July 2003:
 
cos it is more fun this way :)
Posted by chandler, 12:07, 10th July 2003:
 
i still think my idea for a system that moves messages depending on content would be a good idea. if only as an experiment
Posted by arsepuppy, 12:08, 10th July 2003:
 
No, that would suck bawz
Posted by chandler, 12:09, 10th July 2003:
 
yeah i know it would actually suck.
but id like to see sucha system working in a flowing dynamic kind of way.
it would play havok with our jokes though.