iamcal.com Since May 2000

• Happy new year!
• Newbie topic - May 2016
• Newbie topic - April 2016
• Newbie topic - March 2016
• Newbie topic - February 2016
• Newbie topic - January 2016
• Newbie topic - November 2015
• Newbie topic - August 2015
• Newbie topic - July 2015
• Newbie topic - May 2015
• Newbie topic - April 2015
• Newbie topic - March 2015
• Newbie topic - September 2014
• Newbie topic - December 2014
• Newbie topic - October 2014
• Newbie topic - August 2014
• Newbie topic - July 2014
• Newbie topic - June 2014
• Newbie topic - May 2014
• Hello!

If I was as rich and powerful as he was, I'd want to do something about world peace. If you start doing things like that though the powers that be get pissed off no matter how rich and powerful you think you are. I think when he did that political video just before the 'event' happened he was stepping on a few large toes. I'm not saying he did or didn't, he paid to stop the smoke screen on his reputation and the family excepted that. However the damage was done. He is the only one and the child concerned who know in their hearts what happened. The speculation should stop as the two parties agreed it should stop. Child abuse is one of the top five biggest money making industries in the world thats something you should worry about.

He tried to bring about world peace by fucking kids.

good musician. bit of a twat.

How do you ride snow?

Apparently he's run out of cash, so I dought that he has money to spend on World Peace. Also, there will never be world peace, end of.

doubt

oooooooooooooohhhhh, i shall crush the lot of you

michael J
ackson

michail jack off

jack sprem in anas!!!!!!!!

i saw michai lll kack and he shoot sprem in the anas af beargod and gARY in Garys anas in his anas

in gary
and grim
he shoot

michael jackson
the gun man
shoot them
hold them down with his big gun
he shoot
in their anas

asspuppy he had a dog in the ass
a foot in the ass
michael jack offf in the ass of a dog

conspiracy?

they are not childs. they are consenting.

cal was once a pervert and he lured teenage girls to his house with promises of web favours

friday raps in a ragga style
michael jackson

BIOAMALL JACKKK!K!!

? Ana you never said you were owned by half of the people on here

To be honest I am not sure I want to own just part of ana, now I know she is also owned by most of the regulars

dialling.....

erm, can someone call security..

Friday do you rap in a ragga style or reggae? I have never known the difference between the two

ragga is more like hip hop whereas reggae is more bob marley

but im not famous for either, thats for sure

I think from that description I have always perfered regae

ah, bit of a bob fan are we BG?

Yeah Bob Marley et al, arn't most people?

I dont dislike him, used to listen to him a lot, but not these days

shite.

whats shite vic?

who is that jackie-o bloke?

No Idea, you are more likely to find out then weare with the IP and the log in details

Michael Jackson will never run out of money. I don't think he's running out of it now. I think it's maybe just rumors. If he IS running out of money, all he would have to do is have a concert. I'm SURE he could sell one out in the U.S. if the tickets weren't too expensive. Or Europe, where he's as popular as ever. He's HUGE over there. I'm sure he has his reasons. When I found this site some of the replys seemed mature and intellegent, but some aren't. There's this one guy Victor Menendez or something. I've seen his name a couple times. He seems quite unintellegent, mean, and just a jerk. He's not good at thinking up smart things to say so he just swears a lot. I came into this site thinking there would be some smart discussions. There are some it seems but there's also a lot of garbage. It seems like either kids or maybe just dumb adults(i.e. Victor Menendez, maybe) Right now I'm stuck in the introductions forum waiting to get approved. That's all from me for now.

Michael Jackson is having problems with money that is why he is selling neverland and that is straight from the horses mouth

vic swears alot on these because people keep puttingcrap up about michael jackson

que MJ back in town, with his brother, visiting nuns and the rest of his band members

"I had a vision from God, I've seen the light, Im getting the band back together"

(sorry that was supposed to be a quote from the Blues Brothers, but I havent seen it for 10 years, so the wording might be wrong)

wow, thats me told.

Its not worth the effort of typing up an intelligent and well thought-out answer because the response will probably be something along the lines of:

"MIkuL J@ksoN Is tha Most Carng Man in teh wurld an i wUd luv his Sprem in my @nus!"


P.S. Michael Jackson fucks kids!

over here? err, no. he's not. old news. everyone here thinks he fucks kids

To be fair, he is pretty huge over here still.
If he did a concert, it would sell out easily.
Hell, I'd like to go and see him, his songs are great.

How do I go about getting approved?
Is there a test of some sort?

there is a test

it largely involves whether you like michael jackson



what the hell. i'll approve you anyway. you can't be worse than gary. surely

ophhhhhhhhhh can i get approved
i do love michaeii jackson even ifhe does @anus sprem@~@!!!

but hell who doesnt sometimes??

i mean, hey

bearrrrrgod he told me on a PM anbd when we wnet out to get a pint that he actually has been making a mnichell jackeon fansite and all the links go here
and chandler is in on it as well
and they hall hall have of jackson memorabilia that they shape
with paier mache

and jackso9n breaks out of the bars of his cage
of the womb
and he reaches out of the womb when he is still a child
and clutches the mircrophone
and makes one of those child like yelps

and the micriphone and benny and the whole enjgine comes out of the car and michel jhackson and grim and cal and beargood and friday
are all on a leather rug

8|

vic that smilie looks like it is smiling and not just a straight mouth

Maybe a test is not such a bad idea.
If you asked questions like "Who reads the Sun on a regular basis" and "Who has the worst spelling" people who have been reading through for quite a while (like me) would know the answers.

ok Pauly who has the worst spelling that has been accepted? and who reads the Guardian

You have the worst spelling, Beargod. You don't use correct grammar, spelling, or punctuation, you don't capitalise and sometimes you even put words in the wrong order.
What's worse is that you have recently shown that you do know how to spell and punctuate, but continue to do both badly because you can't, it would appear, be bothered to correct your mistakes or type carefully, which shows a lack of consideration for the other people on this site.

Several people on this site read the Guardian. I will pick Cal, because it seems least likely that he is lying about it.

ohh those are mean thingos toi say

i do think that mickel jakson is a lovely man but ifdf you are so hurrible to beargoi theh he will sprem in anas! for you!

yhe guardian is a knieder paper to jacko tha nsun is.

Yes I have the worst spelling and though I can spell and puntuate properly, I can not be bothered half the time cos I am typing quickly at work. I never thought it was a lack of consideration to other people, they just made jokes about it and took the mick

Jackie_o, however, is probably spelling incorrectly to annoy people. His first few posts were coherant and sensible, as he tried to put his point across. After getting a few replies that he didn't like, he has set out on a quest to annoy you all, and will probably get borded within a day or two.

he will come back from time to time, but fading away as he does

@Beargod: People may be making jokes because it is the kindest way of informing you that your posts can be difficult to read.

Sometimes I know my posts are difficult to read but that is because I am tired and do not look at them that often so I do not know what I was trying to say so I just leave it

Don't fret, people on this site don't seem to be too effected by your 'individual' posting style - what seems to annoy more often is your hatred of Microsoft, and the blindness this causes when addressing related issues.

he he he, its cos I am silly, plus I don't like them :)

Shit! Are people still going on about that fuckin sicko, wish they wouldnt...

ppppppppppppppppppppppppppauly;

name one ecsample of wheh i was spleing correcly rathey than this method?

also you make such assuming that I am a "he"???

JACKIE !OOOO!!!

lac of condsideration my fooyt!!!

Who? What? Eh...confusion has set in..

Jacko is a sick man, needs help.

END OF STORY

Hey foggy, where you been?

I am almost positive you are a 'he'.
Also, as I said, your first post was considerate and well-spelt, and you received several harsh replies, after which you started being a bit stupid.

Stop and think about what you are doing, and then start to post again.
Give reasons as to why you don't think Michael Jackson is a child-molester, and be aware that recently the people on this site have had a lot of posts about him, and are fed up with discussing it.

Out of interest, I agree with you, and think it is incredibly unlikely that he ever abused any children.
I think it is sad that a man that has brought so much joy into so many children's lives, and worked closely with terminally ill and handicapped children should gain such a label.

Vic, hows you mate?

I have been in hiding, or as many people refer to it, searching for a job. :(

have you done anything exciting foggy?

not bad pal, not bad. found a job?

Hmmm.... I think it'd be quite hard for you to agree with Jackie O, Pauly, as he seems to have both proposed that Michael Jackson is a lovely man, a talented musician, and also someone who puts Sprem into as many Anas as he can. In fact, whilst being a bit more mis-spelt, JO's first post seemed to suggest that MJ did in fact put Sprem in Anas, but it doesn't affect the point that Billie Jean is quite a nice tune. Cue comparison with Heidgegger being a member of the Nazi party.

Again, it would be quite hard to "give reasons why you don't think MJ is a child molester" whilst you're also "remembering that the people here are fed up with discussing it".

Deary me. What is poor poor Jackie O to do?

I also like 'Billie Jean'

Jeez, a lot of responses since I replied last night. So is that why Vic seems to swear a lot Beargod? Come to think of it all the pages where I saw him swearing and whatever were about Michael Jackson or something about Michael Jackson was in there. I'm sure Vic's not a bad guy or anything. I'm stuck on the introductions forum as long as I come in to say hello and don't be an idiot. That's what it keeps telling me when I try to enter a regular page. I guess I thought originally a lot of swearing meant you were being an idiot. I guess swearing's allowed. I'm not a big swearer myself. In person or in a discussion forum. It's hard to find one where there isn't a least a LITTLE swearing. And is the Cal I keep seeing the iamcal Cal or just someone who decided to adopt the name? And what is the average age of the people who use this site? If anyone knows and can tell me that'd be great. That's all from me.

I only really swear where MJ or the French are concerned.

Yes some people definitely hate the French because they didn't support what they we were trying to do. But some Americans didn't exactly support Bush's vision either. Some thought war wasn't the answer, and apparently the French DID support us, but they didn't want to fight. Some got the wrong impression, thinking the French don't like us. There are our allies, as they were during I think both World Wars. The second I know for sure. But some people have been hating the French for years. There's some stereotypes about the French. They all hate Americans, and they love Jerry Lewis. The truth is some people in France do hate Americans, and the French only loved Jerry Lewis back in the 50's and 60's. Especially when he visited the country in I think it was about '66. Nowadays you mention Jerry Lewis to them and they think it's the name of a singer. As in Jerry Lee Lewis. Anyway i guess I'm getting ahead of myself. That's all.

It's funny how making fun of the french is considered acceptable, but making fun of (for example) Pakistani people is shot down almost instantly.

Also, I find it odd that 'Scot' and 'Brit' and 'Aussie' are perfectly acceptable, but 'Paki' is not.

Often I find it's people trying so hard to be politically correct that they cannot see simple reason.

ent: if you can't see the inherent jokes in the system then i think you're a little too young for this site

pauly: because the word has negative connotations which was replaced it's original meaning. we're not in utopia.

I don't care about the way the French treat Americans. I just hate the French.

C**ts

I agree with Vic.

Ent: The majority of the Brits were against the War on Iraq as what I have heard was most of the Americans too, but we both supported our people when they went into Iraq and hoped it would be over soon, yet it is still going, because not enough thought went into it. Both political leaders lost support from making that war.

The French have always hated the Brits I read recently especially around the begining of the first World War were we only had one unit to help them protect themselves, etc. So I think us Brits should have the opertunity to hate them back :)

Well, making fun of the french does happen and is more tolerated, but it doesn't mean it's a positive thing. Monstrous generalisations, eh. (Oh dear, here I go again. Don't say it.)

don't do it doc, sweeping generalisations are what make life worth living.

Especially about the French!!!!!!!!

Cal: I disagree slighty, after all, the word 'frog' also has negative connotations.
However, the acts of actual violence that were performed upon the Pakistani people have associated this abbreviation with racism.
Also, the word 'Paki' is pronounced 'sharply', as are most of our swear words, which is perhaps an unfortunate coincidence.

Beargod: I joined this 'site' after reading some of your comments and actually laughed out loud (not a criticism) so thanks and I hope to read more.

All: Whats wrong with being a Brit anyway, every other f**cker celebrates their nationality.

?

I'm confused

how about celebrating being a citizen of planet earth? now that's groovy in as much as its an attempt towards peace

We're not British anymore anyway, we are 'European' :o(

Speak for yourself, I'm an Englishman.

I am most Definiatly English

you wouldnt be able to tell by the way you use the language ;)

I would also like to class myself as an Englishman

and a gentleman also :)

My use of the english language is based on the fact I hate writting, but my Passport and birth citificate suggests I am english so I will be till I die

surely your passport says you are british, not english?

i didn't think you got "english" passports...

Yes it is a british passport but it says were you are born, or live or something similar, hence saying I am English

It says your place of birth. Mine says Canterbury

It's so bizarre that we define ourselves by the country in which we were born, or the country in which our passport is from. Dude, what's the point? Who came up with the idea of grouping people by landmass?

I feel no particular pride that I was born in any particular country. I quite like St. Albans, but only cause it's a nice place. I don't go; "I'm so darn proud to be from St. Albans."

I was proud to be English until a group (of about 20 million) nob-head elected Tony Blair :o(

Yeah but he is going this time around, hopefully

Not a chance - I'd bet my hands on it.

Trouble is, if he goes, then we get the amazing leader that is IDS. I'd rather have Blair.

Ohhh...

Our prime minister said "It is history that shall judge me."

Silly boy.

He should have said "It is the Hutton Inquiry that shall judge me."

Viva la revolution!

Compared to the Polls isn't Lib dems the main party up against Labour this time round though?

No.

oh, hmmm well they should be everyone seems to sing their praises over The Labour party and the cons

Yeah, but when it comes down to it they'll all vote Tory if they want to get Labour out of power, because everyone reckons the Lib Dems don't have a chance. Which is fair enough really because I don't think they'd be able to hack being in power that well unless it was some kind of coalition. Although they would introduce PR which can't be a bad thing, except it would give a voice to extremists.

I think the thing that could save the Labour Party (and do some good stuff for the country too) would be if there was a leadership challenge by a relative unknown, over 100 MPs voted for the unknown, thus causing a second round, and then Gordon Brown (or Robin Cook) stepped in and won the Leadership Contest.

Ain't not gonna happen, though..

Doc: If a cirtain labour seat like this uk.news.yahoo.com/030919/325/e8ukw.html votes Lib Dems, I will be surprised if they don't do too badly

but it's not like it's an indicator of what's currently happening: "Blair had not previously lost a by-election seat held by his party since taking power in 1997."

so if anything, this is the start of a move to lim dem - it'll take a while yet before it gets anywhere. imo ;)

The Lib-dem's aren't going anyware, Polls don't really tell the parties anything, its what happens at the ballot box that counts and for the first time for this government the public have turned against them. Labour won't be too upset because the Tories are still a shambles and IDS couldn't lead pissheads to the pub. its certainly bad news for Tony Blair though, Gordon Brown must be pissing himself.

Yeah that is true, but still it does show that Tony Blair has had lots of faith lost for the labour party, and it would do Labour a good turn to have a change of leadership, and probably have a good wash out of all the people in labour at the moment :)

i an Engrishman

No; think about the bloody Thatcher government. Very few people actually liked them or had a great deal of faith in them, and yet they managed to keep in power cause of a strong leader. Unfortunately Blair is the same. They're both strong leaders who are going entirely in the wrong direction.

Personally I don't remember the maggie thatcher government, but didn't it help that the 70's labour government was exceptionaly bad?

RedAndWhiteMan says: Maggie Thatcher was one of the best prime ministers we ever had. She broke the dastardly scumbag unions and set the country on the path to economic success. she also kicked ass on the way.


And Michael Jackson Fucks Kids.

Thatcher was a nightmare. The 70's Callaghan labour government was very far left, which was a pretty good thing, but paved the way for economic right wingers to vote in Heath, followed by Bloody Thatcher. Busting the unions was pretty bloody horrible too. Denying the workers right to take action about the conditions of their employment? Bitch! Economic success? Oh, that thing otherwise known as The Recession.

but but but

she paved the way for economic sucess - without a crap economy, you can't improve it! just like with hitler and humen rights, etc ;)

hey all you freaks

hey :)