Discussion » Jackson Rules

This is a read-only copy. The forum ran on iamcal.com from 2000 until its database was lost in 2016, and this topic was rebuilt from copies saved by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. Some replies may be missing.
Posted by silentbob, 21:06, 16th January 2004:
 
all u knobs in here seem to have it all against jackson. well i have to disagree i trhink that ur all a bunch of kiddi fuckers urself and the court case is completly out of order. there is nothing wrong with micheal jackson he is cool and you fools should not be slanderin his name like this!!!!!!! TWATS
Posted by cal, 14:19, 17th January 2004:
 
nobody's "in here" because this is a webpage. why is the court case out of order? are you about to claim that police shouldn't follow up on allegations of child abuse?
Posted by Victor Menendez, 14:56, 17th January 2004:
 
Nonsense, I quite like Jackson Pollock.
Posted by Victor Menendez, 20:24, 17th January 2004:
 
Here's a little present for you MJ fans, courtesy of B3ta.

www.zooass.com/games/neverland/neverland...

Best played with sound.
Posted by Victor Menendez, 20:35, 17th January 2004:
 
And here's another, same source.

www.alexanderband.dk/dragson/index.htm
Posted by tommorris, 17:20, 18th January 2004:
 
Why don't we just sit tight and wait for the charge to come to court.
Posted by janine, 14:40, 19th January 2004:
 
bob you shit for brains so you think wacko is cool, the marquis de sade was cool but he still shagged kids, could'nt sing a fucking note though
Posted by angeldelight, 14:51, 19th January 2004:
 
silentbob- as the trial hasnt happened yet and we havent heard the evidence, you are no more qualified to say he is INNOCENT than i am to say he is GUILTY.
so until then, zip it!
*excuse pun
Posted by Doctor Lucid, 15:55, 19th January 2004:
 
Well, he is innocent until proven guilty. But anyone who insists that either of these is the case without any evidence can't really be said to be saying anything that significant.
Posted by Victor Menendez, 15:58, 19th January 2004:
 
Maybe 'Jackson Rules' is a different way to play the Happy Families card game, I.E. kids play naked with MJ's thumb where only proctologists dare to tread.
Posted by tommorris, 12:59, 20th January 2004:
 
Or perhaps "Jackson Rules" is a variation on the kama sutra where he finds kids and sprems in anas.
Posted by angeldelight, 13:03, 20th January 2004:
 
cal what is the approved vs rejection ratio? pls tell me you dont approve these dimlows. must want to retain some exclusivity surely
Posted by tommorris, 13:33, 20th January 2004:
 
ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=200312...
Posted by cal, 15:57, 20th January 2004:
 
most people who can hold a conversation get approved
Posted by Brock, 15:57, 20th January 2004:
 
Suddenly I feel less special :(
Posted by Foghorn Leghorn, 15:59, 20th January 2004:
 
yay, I can hold a conversation :o)
Posted by cal, 16:02, 20th January 2004:
 
brock: you should feel special. only about one in 20 visitors come under that category
Posted by angeldelight, 16:05, 20th January 2004:
 
and is there an ignore button for chavvy people?
do bear in mind it took me 2 weeks to find 'edit'
Posted by Foghorn Leghorn, 16:06, 20th January 2004:
 
chavvy?
Posted by angeldelight, 16:07, 20th January 2004:
 
www.chavscum.co.uk
Posted by Foghorn Leghorn, 16:08, 20th January 2004:
 
and?
Posted by angeldelight, 16:10, 20th January 2004:
 
it explains the concept of 'chav'. if you are blind to it then i pronounce you a chavster. ewwww
Posted by Foghorn Leghorn, 16:11, 20th January 2004:
 
you calling me 'peasant underclass'??

Is that right Miss Posh?
Posted by angeldelight, 16:13, 20th January 2004:
 
how observant
Posted by Foghorn Leghorn, 16:15, 20th January 2004:
 
Check the smart ass on you!
Posted by Victor Menendez, 16:15, 20th January 2004:
 
oooh! Have a fight, See who's the best. Have a fight, See who's the best.
Posted by angeldelight, 16:18, 20th January 2004:
 
doh!!!! fresh manicure!
Posted by Foghorn Leghorn, 16:19, 20th January 2004:
 
and I wouldnt waste my time :o)