Discussion » Oh Dear

This is a read-only copy. The forum ran on iamcal.com from 2000 until its database was lost in 2016, and this topic was rebuilt from copies saved by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. Some replies may be missing.
Posted by eatmypiano, 22:07, 2nd February 2004:
 
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/34512...
Posted by Brock, 23:04, 2nd February 2004:
 
Obviously the imagination required for thinking up a name different to his own was too much for the (no doubt) obese, thick, burger-munching, gun-toting twat.

Bloody Yanks.
Posted by November Eclectica, 01:53, 3rd February 2004:
 
what a freakin tard!
Posted by cal, 08:41, 3rd February 2004:
 
i quite like it
Posted by Brock, 09:10, 3rd February 2004:
 
Now there's a surprise...! ;)
Posted by tommorris, 12:10, 3rd February 2004:
 
I'm sorry, I'm going to have to side with Cal on this one. It is kind of cool. You could make lots of jokes about siblings being beta versions or being as unstable as Windows 3.1 Drunkards Edition. Plus surely, if the baby came out early, it would be v.1.5.
Posted by cal, 12:35, 3rd February 2004:
 
surely it's would be 2.0, release candidate zero.

</geek>


who am i kidding - like i'd end a geek section...
Posted by tommorris, 12:38, 3rd February 2004:
 
Heh. Also, would there be a problem with twins? I mean, CVS updates and all. ;)
Posted by cal, 12:41, 3rd February 2004:
 
a twin is abviously a cvs branch
Posted by tommorris, 12:42, 3rd February 2004:
 
"Mummy, is it true that my umbilical cord was Cat-5?"
Posted by trim..., 13:05, 3rd February 2004:
 
funny joke yes. permanently on your birth certificate and mocked throughout your entire life err..no.
Let them decide later in life like ole spiderdan :)
Posted by Doctor Lucid, 13:39, 3rd February 2004:
 
"If he has a child, he could name it 3.0"

- New father Jon Blake Cusack

My god, he's got this all planned out!