iamcal.com Since May 2000

• Happy new year!
• Newbie topic - May 2016
• Newbie topic - April 2016
• Newbie topic - March 2016
• Newbie topic - February 2016
• Newbie topic - January 2016
• Newbie topic - November 2015
• Newbie topic - August 2015
• Newbie topic - July 2015
• Newbie topic - May 2015
• Newbie topic - April 2015
• Newbie topic - March 2015
• Newbie topic - September 2014
• Newbie topic - December 2014
• Newbie topic - October 2014
• Newbie topic - August 2014
• Newbie topic - July 2014
• Newbie topic - June 2014
• Newbie topic - May 2014
• Hello!

You don't like the French, right?
But Stella is made by the French, right?

Belgians, toss-piece. They are like French people, but more boring and less smelly and arrogant...

Oh yeah.

Never mind, then.

Could be worse, you could have created an entire new thread to make yourself look a fuckwit with that ill-informed mistake, eh?

Close shave, Grim...

hehehe

Or I could have got something completely wrong and gone all ad hominem on the person that was correct, right Brockie?

Poor Grim... I'd rather drink bleach than French beer. Not because I hate the French so much as the fact that bleach doesnt have that terrible aftertaste that all French lagers seem to.

I'd imagine that bleach has a pretty nasty aftertase of it's own...

It's minimal compared to French lager.

french lager turns your whites puce, too

Actually, Grim..., I proved your point wrong with hard facts. I then called you a prick, because you refused to accept being wrong and attempted to change the original argument to try and worm out of it. That's altogether different from ad hominem, my old china...

;)

What? Grim refused to accept being wrong and attempted to change the original arguement to try and worm out of it?

Well i never.

Hard to believe, I know. Must have been an isolated incident.

(Isolated to every argument he participates in, obviously).

You know, you still haven't found a thread where I did this.

We found a few between us, but you refused to acknowledge or recognise that you did it despite this. So we got bored of you saying "No I didn't" as your sole defense, so we left it alone.

Bless.

/rests case

Let me try for you.
I think you've accused me of doing it twice (which is obviously all the time).

One was in the mirror / candle thread, where I attempted to prove the theory using a thought experiment.
Obviously, being a thought experiment, every part of the original problem was simplified to make it easier to understand.
Of course, the theory remained the same, and could also be proved in a mirror / candle case, as long as everybody had a spare few hours, a calculator, an A-Level in Math's and a Masters in Physics.
And, of course, I was right, not wrong =]

The other was the world travelling thread, where I said something, then in my very next post came back and said why I thought that, but, of course, that was me 'changing the original argument'.

Perhaps I should mention the Mastermind thread, where I didn't make my question specific enough. Abe pointed out that I was changing my question, and he was right, so I let him have the Mastermind chair (in which he promptly cheated).
But that was my fault for not being specific enough.

You'll also find a lot of cases where I am told I am wrong, and I agree.
Like the start of this thread, for instance.

there was the jimmy hill big nose thread too.

it's odd that a number of people can all see you doing this and that not one person has come to your defense to state that you're not continually changing your arguement..

my what a good idea for a poll...

Oh yeah, Jimmy Hill, where the black man came along and agreed about the use of certain words, and the thread instantly died.

Poll away.

jeff: Due to the fact that he always defaults to SWERVE if there is the slightest bit of ambiguity, and seems physically incapable of focussing on the parts of the argument we mean, I have to assume this will continue to be an issue where Grim... just sees the world in a completely different way to everyone else..

Tired now. This argument feels like trying to walk through 3 foot of treacle.

:)

Just like the start of this thread, you mean?



As opposed to the actual argument, you mean?



I'd eat the treacle =]

Any ambiguity at the start of this thread was there? Thought not. Classic example of Grim-focus, thank you. Totally missing the point and selectively reading to try and prove a different one.

And the actual argument is generally the bit that we are referring to, just not the bit that you've tried to twist it into later on when you realise you're wrong...

Fuck-monkey.

;)

/looks up ambiguity...

Ah-ha =]
I thought it meant 'wrong-ness' - how ironic...

That's kind of the point, I don't do that.

Anyway, this is fucking boring.

Hang on, woah - I've just realised something.

Brock, have you got an email address?
Or could you send me an email so I can send you something if you don't want to post it (obviously, the fan-mail would clog your box up =])?

Losing gets on my tits, too. At least we have one thing in common...

:D

%&^%*&£$^&^&$

So you lost...


Right back there?

That was me being tired of hitting my head against a brick wall by attempting to get you to see the point. It wasn't a reference to losing, just a lack of progress.

Easy mistake to make, though, nob-rot. Every night "it gets on my tits", and I have to sleep for 8 hours to get it off again...

Oh no. Actually when I think about it, I realise that irritation and fatigue are completely different!

Spaz. Joey Deacon. 'Special' boy.

leave joey out of this brock...

Is he a relative of yours then, jeff?

he's your mum

So not a bit like incorrectness and boredom, then...

"he's your mum"

Fuck, that made me laugh.

:D

Not a bit like incorrectedness, Grim..., no.

For that is not a word. Buy a dictionary, or just stick a couple of on-line ones in your favourites like me and Alfie do...

edit:
GRIM IS A BIG FAT CUNT!!!!

)(&()*&*()*)&)(&

Um... Incorrectness.

Where did you get the 'ed' from?

/waits for the inevitable edit...

Tum-te-tum.

=]