Posted by
tanny, 06:43, 11th August 2004:
what is your idea about this?
Posted by
Saltation, 08:48, 11th August 2004:
oh come on grim, that;s a bit homophobic. if girls want to lick and stroke other girls, surely that's THEIR business? don't be so negative!
oo look at the time of your post, tsk tsk, go and wait for that first coffee to settle in properly.
Posted by
Saltation, 08:57, 11th August 2004:
oh i see (having read backwards thru a few threads now) (sorry: thredZ). you're not talking to the post but the poster. and i agree. let's roll out some 9mm editorial redaction.
".3030 -- for when you care enough to send the best"
Posted by
Saltation, 08:57, 11th August 2004:
oh i see (having read backwards thru a few threads now) (sorry: thredZ). you're not talking to the post but the poster. and i agree. let's roll out some 9mm editorial redaction.
".3030 -- for when you care enough to send the best"
Posted by
Brock, 09:15, 11th August 2004:
So good he said it twice?
Posted by
Saltation, 09:36, 11th August 2004:
hmm, odd browser fart there. both my post's and tanny's.
odder too that cal's auto-doublepost-blocker didn't pick it up
Posted by
Uncle Moc, 11:23, 11th August 2004:
shorely Tanny didn't "DP".
Posted by
TALME, 11:35, 11th August 2004:
I AM TO SEE AND FEEL HOW BEAUTIFUL YOU AS A WOMAN ARE.
Posted by
cal, 18:19, 11th August 2004:
hmm, no sure how that manage3d to double post. i need to dig into the code a little more at some point. probably an issue with an escaped post being compared to an unescaped one
Posted by
Saltation, 18:42, 11th August 2004:
>manage3d
hey, c001 133tsp34k! iRca1.c0m w00t
could it be a browser brainfart handing your code a dodgy session id?