Discussion » The Backless G-string

This is a read-only copy. The forum ran on iamcal.com from 2000 until its database was lost in 2016, and this topic was rebuilt from copies saved by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. Some replies may be missing.
Posted by Sul, 14:01, 13th August 2004:
 
It doesnt look as sexy as it sounds

http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/...
Posted by Brock, 14:01, 13th August 2004:
 
I so knew who would have started a thread with that title.

:D

(and nice link, fuckwad)
Posted by Sul, 14:03, 13th August 2004:
 
Not my fault, shoddy coding from Cal.

Try now.
Posted by Brock, 14:04, 13th August 2004:
 
They just look like they're falling down/half off.

Nice image, but look pointless and a bit uncomfortable, really. I'm not going to wear any, that's for sure.
Posted by su, 14:05, 13th August 2004:
 
those defeat the purpose of a G string
you'd get VPL wearing them
Posted by Sul, 14:07, 13th August 2004:
 
Only if they werent clean. I mean, I dont think you're one to share panties, su.
Posted by su, 14:09, 13th August 2004:
 
and white underwear - how boring
Posted by su, 14:09, 13th August 2004:
 
i know someone who did make some nice money selling her used underwear
Posted by RUSS, 14:12, 13th August 2004:
 
how they are supposed to be better than g-ropes i don't understand. they're crap
Posted by WarHead, 14:13, 13th August 2004:
 
The whole POINT is to provocatively show a bit of undy to testosterone fuelled young spunks, isn't it?
Posted by Sul, 14:16, 13th August 2004:
 
But now you can provocatively show a bit of arse crack to testosterone fuelled young spunks.
Posted by su, 14:18, 13th August 2004:
 
do any of you think a visable G String is attractive in a woman?
Posted by Sul, 14:20, 13th August 2004:
 
Nah. That knicker stuffing thing doesnt really get me off.
Posted by Hanni, 14:25, 13th August 2004:
 
No? Damn.
Posted by Hanni, 14:26, 13th August 2004:
 
How about you Brock?
Posted by su, 14:28, 13th August 2004:
 
Hanni :D
- where ya been girl?
- are you doing the flickr cd swappage?
Posted by Hanni, 14:29, 13th August 2004:
 
I been workin' hard. It's shite.
Yeah Im doin the swappage - just on the case now in fact :) can you send me the address again? I sent mine last night.
Posted by su, 14:33, 13th August 2004:
 
Yuck - work :/
Posted by Kitty, 15:31, 13th August 2004:
 
what's wrong with not wearing any? cuts out VPL and the horrible visible g scenario
Posted by WarHead, 15:37, 13th August 2004:
 
do any of you think a visable G String is attractive in a woman?


That depends on the woman and the g-string. Let me have a look and I'll tell you. ;0)
Posted by Brock, 15:41, 13th August 2004:
 
su, 14:18 13 August 2004:
do any of you think a visable G String is attractive in a woman?


Nah, I reckon you'd have to hook it out with your finger. Then it'd look alright.

:)

Hanni: Try me. We'll see how we go, eh?
Posted by Alfie, 15:42, 13th August 2004:
 
probably wouldn't want to do that every week of the month though.
Posted by Brock, 15:42, 13th August 2004:
 
*pop*

Ooops. Pulled the wrong bit.
Posted by Brock, 15:50, 13th August 2004:
 
(Oh, and Kitty? You rock. I like the logic)
Posted by Alfie, 15:57, 13th August 2004:
 
"what's wrong with not wearing any? cuts out VPL and the horrible visible g scenario"

Sweaty/damp trouser gusset not withstanding?
Posted by Brock, 16:01, 13th August 2004:
 
Skirts? Regularly washing your trousers?

Both solutions that wouldn't occur to you then?

You're less likely to get a sweaty crotch with no undercrackers anyway.
Posted by Alfie, 16:10, 13th August 2004:
 
Skirts are an option yet but

"Regularly washing your trousers?"

Thats part of the rason for wearing underwear in the first place surely? Otherwise people would have to wash their trousers as regularly as their underwear.
Posted by Kitty, 16:11, 13th August 2004:
 
cheers Brock :)
Posted by Alfie, 16:12, 13th August 2004:
 
"less likely to get a sweaty crotch with no undercrackers anyway"

I wasn't only refering to sweat.
Posted by Kitty, 16:13, 13th August 2004:
 
I constantly go commando - I think it's healthier and I've never had any 'moisture' probs as yet
Posted by Alfie, 16:15, 13th August 2004:
 
constantly at all times of the month?
Posted by Kitty, 16:18, 13th August 2004:
 
yes - there are things to combat this you know!
Posted by Grim..., 16:33, 13th August 2004:
 
A hysterectomy?
Posted by Kitty, 16:35, 13th August 2004:
 
hehe thats one option
Posted by Doctor Lucid, 16:46, 13th August 2004:
 
mooncup?
Posted by su, 17:17, 13th August 2004:
 
nappies?
Posted by Brock, 17:23, 13th August 2004:
 
I would imagine that the young lady in question could just look at a picture of Grim... That would pretty much eliminate any hint of wetness.
Posted by su, 17:25, 13th August 2004:
 
so if i look at Grim, i never have to have my period ever again?


WooooooHooooooo!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Alfie, 17:26, 13th August 2004:
 
or get preggers and then not have any monthly trubs for 9 months, but ending with the "mother" of all commando faux pas.
Posted by su, 17:37, 13th August 2004:
 
plus the 9months of hemaroids
Posted by su, 17:46, 13th August 2004:
 
But in all seriousness
how do you cope going commando at that time of the month Kitty
Posted by Brock, 18:35, 13th August 2004:
 
She probably just wears red shoes...
Posted by Hanni, 18:42, 13th August 2004:
 
Right then B, any colour prefs?
Posted by Saltation, 18:56, 13th August 2004:
 
oo gold coast, my home town

can i just say how proud i am, that the core cultural values that made me what i am today, are here and now being presented to the world in such fine and cleanly fashion

Posted by Saltation, 19:04, 13th August 2004:
 
A$300k covers both prototype manufacture AND global patenting?!?!


ffs
i'm sitting on an unsubmitted patent which i'd estimated legal costs £100-150k. >:[ maybe i should move back to oz and do it.
upside is good. chap did similar but with physical kit and restricted to england; he hit £1.2bn turnover after 18months.
Posted by Brock, 19:06, 13th August 2004:
 
Hanni: No colour preferences. Surprise me. Or even better, model a few colours, and allow me to closely inspect each one so that I may be able to express an informed opinion at a later date...

You'd be helping my intellectual growth, see? Or something...
Posted by Saltation, 19:19, 13th August 2004:
 
"pardon me, your intellect is showing"

"is that your frontal lobe, or are you ... oh right"
Posted by Brock, 19:21, 13th August 2004:
 
Or, if I get lucky:

"your intellect just spat in my eye!"
Posted by lau, 21:53, 13th August 2004:
 
Do you think the models were her daughters?
Posted by su, 23:28, 13th August 2004:
 
you know what really scares me
the strange positioning of that young girls very long finger
Posted by jeffld, 23:55, 14th August 2004:
 
Yes. Very disturbing.

Posted by Doctor Lucid, 11:46, 15th August 2004:
 
Karolina Sprem!
Posted by lickitysplit, 18:52, 15th August 2004:
 
eh.. my opinion is a little slip of the panties is alright, but when you're walking around with half of your thong sticking out, it's not fashion or sexy- trashy
definitely depends on the person. *shudder*
Posted by lickitysplit, 18:53, 15th August 2004:
 
And, Kitty is right. There is nothing wrong with not wearing any.
And, tampons, people, tampons