Discussion » He's Inercent!

This is a read-only copy. The forum ran on iamcal.com from 2000 until its database was lost in 2016, and this topic was rebuilt from copies saved by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. Some replies may be missing, and its dates are approximate.
Posted by Grim..., around June 2005:
 
Well well well...
Posted by Brock, around 12th June 2005:
 
Three holes in the ground...
Posted by Alfie_DUPE1, around 12th June 2005:
 
Noticed this on the BBC site. Got a screen capture before they edited it:

Posted by Brock, around 12th June 2005:
 
:D
Posted by Grim..., around 12th June 2005:
 
I always said I didn't think he did it =]

Go me!
Posted by Brock, around 12th June 2005:
 
Cos that proves it beyone doubt, after all. I mean to suggest that the american legal system is anything other than entirely infallible would be ridiculous.

Clearly. :/
Posted by ellipse, around 12th June 2005:
 
problem was, he couldn't be for having shitloads of porn around small children.
Posted by WarHead, around 12th June 2005:
 
Ooops, they didn't charge him with that, did they?

I demand a retrial.
Posted by Ana_DUPE1, around 12th June 2005:
 
Personally, I thought he was going to be found guilty of supplying alcohol to minors, at least.
Posted by Grim..., around 13th June 2005:
 
Me too. I though he would probably be found guilty of the lewd conduct, considering he openly admits to sleeping with the kid, but they let him off that too.
Posted by Victor Menendezz, around 13th June 2005:
 
Fair play Michael. well done sir.
Posted by Doctor Lucid_DUPE1, around 13th June 2005:
 
Looks like we were all wrong and those people who couldn't spell were right.

I think we owe them an apology.
Posted by Saltation_DUPE1, around 13th June 2005:
 
WE O AN APLOGI!!!
Posted by Rosie_DUPE1, around 13th June 2005:
 
I think its bloody disgusting. Hes a big old kiddie-fiddling freak. Just because he's rich doesn't mean he can go around doing what he wants. i bloody well knew that he was going to get off the hook - i should have put money on it. He's a creep. You only have to take one look at him and you see that he's a fruitcake.
He's not due an apology. He's due a good beating around the skull with a large peice of wood with nails sticking out of it.
Posted by Alfie_DUPE1, around 13th June 2005:
 
You should definately have put that money on him being found innocent. Then you would have won either way.
Posted by Victor Menendezz, around 13th June 2005:
 
Seems rather convenient that Ana comes out of hiding at the same time as MJ is found innercent.
Posted by WarHead, around 13th June 2005:
 
Why?
Posted by Ana_DUPE1, around 13th June 2005:
 
I'd like to know why as well...

Especially since Victor appears to have his facts wrong ;)

Oh, and I'd better let you know - if I disappear again, it's because the page has become too large to load on my phone. I'm using a Nokia 3100, it's not exactly top-of-the-range.
Posted by WarHead, around August 2006:
 
Save MJ
Posted by Saltation_DUPE1, around August 2006:
 
michael jackson fucks kids in the Ana's what?
Posted by WarHead, around February 2008:
 
Anyone want to buy a fun fair. Only one previous owner who fecked kids in the ainarse.
Posted by syl, around February 2008:
 
Is he really bankrupt?
Posted by WarHead, around February 2008:
 
Probably not, but we can always hope.
Posted by WarHead, around 4th March 2008:
 
Someone else who's inercent - Andy Kershaw.

He must have a screw lose. I mean, who in their right mind is going to live on the Isle of Man?
Posted by Saltation, 9th March 2008:
 
tail-less cats