Discussion » The next sentence is false.

This is a read-only copy. The forum ran on iamcal.com from 2000 until its database was lost in 2016, and this topic was rebuilt from copies saved by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. Some replies may be missing, and its dates are approximate.
Posted by Saltation_DUPE1, around September 2005:
 
The previous sentence is true.

Doc & Sul, i reckon you particularly will like some of these.
You have of course, just begun the sentence that you have just finished reading.
&
This a self-referential sentence.
Posted by Saltation_DUPE1, around September 2005:
 
gads, gödel's slandering Flickr
To every w-consistent recursive class k of formulae there correspond recursive class signs r, such that neither uGenr nor Neg(uGenr) belongs to FLG (k) (where u is the free variable of r)
-Kurt Gödel, "On Formally Undecidable Propositions in Principia Mathematica and Related Systems I"
Posted by Saltation_DUPE1, around September 2005:
 
and shouldn't that be "(where u r the free variable of r)"


possibly also a "jim lad" or two wouldn't go astray either
Posted by Doctor Lucid_DUPE1, around 7th September 2005:
 
*click click*

Entertaining three posts of Salty talking to himself. But interesting stuff. Godel copied all his research off a man called Schmidt, so I wouldn't worry.
Posted by Saltation_DUPE1, around 7th September 2005:
 
gödel's full of schmidt?

never take seriously anyone named after an undergarment. i never said this before but now i think i always will have.
Posted by Doctor Lucid_DUPE1, around 7th September 2005:
 
www.google.com/search?sourc...
Posted by jeffld_DUPE1, around 7th September 2005:
 
or...

John Jacob Jingle Himer Schmidt
Posted by cal_DUPE1, around 8th September 2005:
 
jesus - we're already google hit number 2. how does this site have so much google juice?
Posted by Saltation_DUPE1, around 8th September 2005:
 
7 or 8 here, depending on whether you count a subtopic as a separate hit or not. hmm. i wonder if google now modifies rank per user, based on previous activity?
Posted by Brock, around 8th September 2005:
 
It's Sul's prolific self abuse that produces such enormous quantities of it, I reckon.
Posted by cal_DUPE1, around 8th September 2005:
 
aha - i had personalised search turned on

google is just trying to appease me
Posted by Salt 'n Pepper, around 8th September 2005:
 
Can I have a picture of Sul?
Posted by Brock, around 8th September 2005:
 
You had a personalised search on, and your own site was second?

That sounds a bit shit then doesn't it?
Posted by ellipse, around 8th September 2005:
 
google knows he works for yahoo!