out of sheer boredom, i just tried to validate the page via the bottom links.
HOWEVER, apparently there are some errors...
i am dissapointed, cal :(
Posted by
Sul_DUPE1, around 20th November 2005:
"Property overflow-y"
You hear that Cal? I dont agree but they say your property is overflow-y. I only seem to recall the blender from the Canada pad so I cant really make a valid, up-to-date opinion but I very much doubt your new place is overflow-y. You've got enough money to afford a decent plumber havent you? Or is this the reason why you're pimping yourself out to the NYC crowd?
Posted by
Sul_DUPE1, around 20th November 2005:
Man-whoring for CSS validation.
It's a sad world we live in.
edit: Y'know, one where mariah carey can have a singing career.
Posted by
Gary, around 20th November 2005:
Hmm. The validation errors are caused by the use of unencoded ampersands. This isn't a coding error by Cal as such, and can probably be corrected by forcing the unencoded ampersands to be encoded.
Posted by
Sul_DUPE1, around 20th November 2005:
Hold up, this doesnt make ANY sense.
£$^$£%$^£%^%&%&&
That's better.
Posted by
Gary, around 20th November 2005:
Oh, we're talking about the CSS? Doh! I was talking about the XHTML...
Posted by
cal_DUPE1, around 21st November 2005:
the text used to read "we
try to have valid..."
maybe i should change it back :)
Posted by
Gary, around 21st November 2005:
edit: Y'know, one where mariah carey can have a singing career.
Don't think I haven't seen that by the way. :P